Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propagate auto_id_timestamp in primary-replica resync #33964

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 22, 2018

Conversation

dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented Sep 22, 2018

A follow-up of #33693 to propagate max_seen_auto_id_timestamp in a primary-replica resync.

Relates #33693

A follow-up of elastic#33693 to propagate max_seen_auto_id_timestamp in a primary-replica resync.
@dnhatn dnhatn added >enhancement :Distributed/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. v7.0.0 v6.5.0 labels Sep 22, 2018
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

Copy link
Contributor

@bleskes bleskes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

for (IndexRequest request : replicationRequests) {
shards.index(request); // deliver via normal replication
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we miss an assertion to check that all shards are identical?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have this check in the teardown but yes, I added an explicit one here :).

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ public void testSyncerSendsOffCorrectDocuments() throws Exception {
// Index doc but not advance local checkpoint.
shard.applyIndexOperationOnPrimary(Versions.MATCH_ANY, VersionType.INTERNAL,
SourceToParse.source(shard.shardId().getIndexName(), "_doc", Integer.toString(i), new BytesArray("{}"), XContentType.JSON),
IndexRequest.UNSET_AUTO_GENERATED_TIMESTAMP, false);
randomNonNegativeLong(), randomBoolean());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we randomly want to have normal ops here (i.e. UNSET_AUTO_GENERATED_TIMESTAMP)

if (in.getVersion().onOrAfter(Version.V_7_0_0_alpha1)) {
maxSeenAutoIdTimestampOnPrimary = in.readZLong();
} else {
maxSeenAutoIdTimestampOnPrimary = -1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use UNSET_AUTO_GENERATED_TIMESTAMP?

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit e7ae2f9 into elastic:master Sep 22, 2018
@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Sep 22, 2018

Thanks @bleskes.

@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the resync-timestamp branch September 22, 2018 15:40
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2018
A follow-up of #33693 to propagate max_seen_auto_id_timestamp in a
primary-replica resync.

Relates #33693
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2018
kcm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
A follow-up of #33693 to propagate max_seen_auto_id_timestamp in a
primary-replica resync.

Relates #33693
kcm pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. >enhancement v6.5.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants